caluva19835

caluva19835 captures life's important moments!

Almost cheap air jordan 6 three months ago, the European Agriculture Ministers were struggling through a major reform of its agricultural policy. It was the third in ten years, and they should end the madness: At home in Europe, they should make the farmers of Landschaftsschändern to landscape conservationists and in the world to European farmers take out the stain to bring their overproduction agricultural markets messed up. In Cancn however, the promises found no faith. The WTO Ministerial Conference also failed at the European agricultural policy. However, these objectives can achieve fair trade and intact nature in general at the same time, in such a way that the farmers still remains enough money to live? Or, the European Union is trying to reconcile the irreconcilable? First, the status quo: the EU agricultural policy harms the developing countries as well as the nature and the local taxpayers. The latter cost subsidies more than 40 billion euros a year alone from the Brussels budget. What for? For trade-income transfers, which are just the main causes of impairments to nature and landscape benefit, the Advisory Council on the Environment. So stop with the subsidy economy? This could be the old continent soon look different. would probably cheap air jordan 3 survive the highly industrialized Geflügelund pig farms and some large grain farms. Hundreds of thousands of small farmers but would have to give up their farms, lack of competitiveness. Whole villages and countryside would lose their distinctive element. This would prevent the EU agriculture ministers, as they gathered in late June in Luxembourg. They decided that agricultural subsidies not to cut, but to decouple. Henceforth, the farmers get money because they are farmers regardless of what and how much they produce. The hope, the reformer, is reducing production, thereby helping the farmers in the South. Because local farmers receive a premium only in full, if they have conducted in the fields and in the barns applicable law, aims to benefit the environment. Too good to be true. As long as the subsidies are not specifically linked to socially desirable additional services provided by farmers, they should continue to do what they've always done: so much and produce so cheaply as they can. Another dispute with the trading partners is therefore programmed. So the agricultural subsidies must not only decouple, but recoupling, who wants to enter the European agriculture has a future. Example: About 20 years ago, 90 percent of the local grazing dairy cows on pastures, today, two-thirds of high performance animals in stables. If the previous conditions are restored, the company must pay for it. Small farmers have a chance, but only if they send the cows back to the pasture. Because they then inevitably produced less milk, and the farmers would be helped in developing countries, which would not longer fear that their home spoils the excess milk from Europe the business.